Tuesday, February 13, 2007

English Spelling Reform

I recently read an article from Interesting Thing of the Day entitled English Spelling Reform: The difficult path to simpler spelling. I agree with all of the reasons fro a spelling reform, and think all the reasons against are fairly lame. Any dissenting opinions?

1 comment:

  1. Intrusteen. Ime not shur how sumtheeng like that wud go ovur for thoz uv us hoo hav alredde lurnd eenglush. Wee wud hav tu lurn tu reed al over ugen. And it wudnt be fun.


Circa Now